Legal Opinion

Founders Insurance v. Contreras

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 2005No. 1-04-3188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

This appeal arises out of an automobile collision between vehicles driven by defendants-appellants Joel Contreras, Jr., and Sung Kuk. The sole issue on appeal is whether the “initial permission” rule applies under the facts in this case, thereby entitling Joel Contreras, Jr. (hereinafter Contreras Jr.), to automobile liability coverage.

The “initial permission” rule provides that once the owner or named insured of an automobile liability insurance policy containing an omnibus clause 1 gives another individual permission to use the vehicle (the initial permittee), any person subsequently given…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Bier v. Leanna Lakeside Property Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. American Country Insurance v. WilcoxonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The City of Chicago v. RamirezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. McGoey v. BraceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API