In re Connolly
New York Surrogate's Court
Application to direct a testamentary trustee to pay over income to the guardian of an infant beneficiary.
1Opinion of the Court
Ketcham, S.
This case presents a distinction which is too often misunderstood or neglected. Its recognition will save many useless applications to the court.
Where a testamentary trustee is imperatively directed to pay income to an infant, it should be paid in full to the general guardian, who in turn may apply it to the maintenance and education of his ward under the order of the court.
But where the trustee is required to exercise his discretion as to the use of the income, the gift to the child is only of so much of the income as the trustee shall properly determine to apply, and it is not…
2Cited by17 opinions
- In re the Estate of HaydenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of LittmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of WellsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re DuncanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
- In re the Estate of GeltmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.