Legal Opinion

City of Salem v. Guillen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 2009No. 07C40078; A136956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted in Salem Municipal Court of one count of prohibited touching. Salem Revised Code (SRC) 96.300(a). She appealed to Marion County Circuit Court for trial de novo, as authorized by ORS 221.359 and ORS 221.360, and moved to dismiss the charges on the ground (among others) that the code provision violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, the state’s free expression guarantee. The court agreed and dismissed the charges. The city appeals.

City of Salem v. Lawrow, 233 Or App 32, 225 P3d 51 (2009), is identical to this case except for the identity of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Salem v. LawrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Salem v. GuillenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API