Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kalembach v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1891Published

Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1DissentMcG-rath, J.

Defendant’s freight station at Chelsea is immediately west of Main street. The main siding is north of the main track. Just north of this siding, and near Main street, is Henning’s apple warehouse. North of Henning’s warehouse is Kempf’s warehouse, the easterly end of which is near Main street, and the westerly end of which extends beyond Henning’s warehouse. Another side track lies just south of Kempf’s warehouse, with sufficient room between this side track and Henning’s for a narrow roadway, which is used for the receipt and delivery of freight, and it was customary to load and unload…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Continental Insurance v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Case v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API