Legal Opinion
Centennial Land & Development Co. v. Township of Medford
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 3, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wells, J. S. C.
This motion for summary judgment is made by the individual defendants, members of the Medford Township Planning Board, Board of Adjustment and Township Committee, respectively, who have been sued in their individual capacities by plaintiff development corporation. The facts, although detailed and complex, may be summarized for purposes of this motion as follows:
In 1970 plaintiff’s predecessor in title applied to the Planning Board of Medford Township for subdivision approval for a certain parcel situate within the township’s boundaries, which property was acquired by plaintiffs…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jodeco, Inc. v. HannDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Burlington Assem. of God v. Zoning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Centennial Land & Dev. Co. v. Tp. of MedfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Anastasio v. Planning Board of West OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Anastasio v. WEST ORANGE TP. PLAN. BD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.