Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Kearns

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1920No. 23,410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.

The appellees contend that, as the transcript of proceedings below was not filed here within 180 days from the date of the overruling of the motion of appellant for a new trial, this appeal should be dismissed.

*6*5The transcript was filed within 180 days from the date the court overruled appellant’s motion to modify *6the judgment rendered. This motion to modify was filed upon the last day of the term at which the motion for a new trial was overruled and the judgment rendered. The filing of a motion to modify a judgment suspends and. postpones the finality of the jfidgment until the motion to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. RoudebushIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Blaemire v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KearnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Thomas v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Clouser v. MockIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeiselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. City of Michigan City v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. HERALD v. Marion County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API