Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Clay County. Tried below before Hon. S. A. Denny. Allen & Wantland and P. M. Stine, for appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

Appellee was a tenant of appellant, and instituted suit in the Justice Court upon an account aggregating ninety-six dollars. Among other items specified was one of forty dollars for “three-fourths of two bales of cotton, less cost of picking.” The landlord, Huggins, replied with a counterclaim aggregating the sum of $105.70. In the Justice Court appellee Reynolds failed to recover, and appealed his cause to the County Court of Clay County. The trial there resulted in a general verdict for appellee in the sum of $45.93, from which this appeal has been prosecuted.

On a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dikes v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. McGoon v. AnkenyIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Humphreys Oil Co. v. LilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Humphreys Oil Co. v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Sapp v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Trinity County Dumber Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API