Legal Opinion

V. D. Anderson Co. v. Young

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1937No. 7131PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted directly in the Supreme Court by V. D. Anderson Company, a corporation, and Geo. 0. Wilson and E. M. Reichman, its attorneys, against Honorable Towne Young, Judge of the 44th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to compel him to proceed to trial *633and final judgment in a certain cause pending in that court. Honorable W. R Ewing, Judge of the 31st District Court of Wheeler County, Texas, G. 0. McCrohan, Wheeler Cotton Oil Company, a corporation, and Sanders & Scott, and R. G. Windsor, attorneys, are also made parties to this proceeding. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Powers v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Russell v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Conn v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. McCurdy v. GageTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Howell v. MauzyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. In re J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Lancaster v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1956

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API