Legal Opinion · Dissent

Landstad v. McClellan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1919No. File No. 4565Published

Appeal from Circuit ‘Court, Minnehaha County. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by Ole B. Landstad, against A. H. McClellan and others. From an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1DissentSmith, P. J.

I cannot concur in the conclusion reached by my Associates. Appellant's response to the motion to dismiss the appeal is that the appeal, though not taken within 60 days after the filing of the order denying the motion for a new trial, was, in fact, taken, within 60 days after the service of the written notice required by section 442, Code Civ. Proc. (Rev. Code 1919, § 3147), which, as amended by section 1, c. 201, Laws of 1917, reads as follows:

“An appeal to the Supreme Court must be taken within sixty days after written notice of. the filing of the order shall have been given to the party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Prescott v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  3. More v. Western Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Rosenkrans v. KlineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Clark Implement Co. v. WaddenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API