Riedermann v. Stewart
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The suit in this case arises out of the following state of facts:
Ben and Mary Harris executed a mortgage on certain land to the' appellant, Henry Riedermann. Riedermann, in a conversation -with the appellee, stated that the mortgagors were in default, and suggested the purchase of the property by the appellee, who lived near by. Subsequently Riedermann caused a notice to be published, which stated that the mortgage was in default and that it would be foreclosed under the powers therein contained. At this sale the appellee was the highest bidder, his bid being $350, which he paid. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carlisle v. KillebrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Warble v. Sulzberger Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Alabama Terminal R. R. v. BennsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Shumake v. Nelms' Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Coleman v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.