Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Burbank
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
1Opinion of the Court
Jones, O. B., J.; Swing and Jones, E. H., JJ., concurring.
The action below was brought by Oberst Burbank, as administrator of James A. Mulvey, deceased, to recover $210 with interest and for an accounting, under a policy No. 42,660,077 issued by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company upon the life of James Mulvey, November 8, 1909, then twenty years of age, on the payment of weekly premiums of ten cents.
The language of the policy contained the following. facility-of-payment clause:
“The company may pay the amount due under this policy to either the beneficiary named below, or to the executor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- State v. SchafferSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
- Thomas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Wilkinson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jerry Reeves v. Superintendent Fayette SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Jerry Reeves v. Superintendent Fayette SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018