Legal Opinion

Dorris v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1982No. [P.C. No. 82, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of post conviction relief.

The petitioner concludes his twenty-one page “petition” for post conviction relief—which is in effect not a petition at all, but a diatribe of what he says are the “tyrannical and dictatorial criminal procedures” under which he was tried— by contending in effect (i) that he is innocent, which is a question that may not be raised in a collateral proceeding [Galloway v. Warden, 221 Md. 611, 157 A. 2d 284 (1960)]; (ii) that his constitutional rights were violated (a) because the evidence was insufficient to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Galloway v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. McClung v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Austin v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Hyde v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Nixon v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Herbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Gardner v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API