Dorris v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of post conviction relief.
The petitioner concludes his twenty-one page “petition” for post conviction relief—which is in effect not a petition at all, but a diatribe of what he says are the “tyrannical and dictatorial criminal procedures” under which he was tried— by contending in effect (i) that he is innocent, which is a question that may not be raised in a collateral proceeding [Galloway v. Warden, 221 Md. 611, 157 A. 2d 284 (1960)]; (ii) that his constitutional rights were violated (a) because the evidence was insufficient to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Galloway v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- McClung v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Austin v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Hyde v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Nixon v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Herbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Gardner v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.