Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided May 25, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
These are two separate applications. The first is by Charles Benner and others that as “a tort creditors’ committee” they be admitted as a party defendant in this cause, with liberty to plead and be heard and to receive notice of all proceedings. The other application is, by the same committee, for an order “adopting certain rules and classification, contained in some books relating to street railway accounting, as the basis for classification of claims; also requiring the special masters to report when each claim accrued, and whether or not it is an operating expense;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. DanaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- St. Louis Trust Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. OsbornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Veatch v. American Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Crawford v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910