Legal Opinion

Osterloh v. Osterloh

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

As appears from the foregoing statement of facts, the plaintiff brings suit for recovery of money on a contract and the defendant by counterclaim seeks rescission of the contract. The claimed basis for rescission seems to be threefold: (1) The plaintiff was to surrender possession of a dwelling house and a two-acre tract on which it was situated to defendant, and ü> deliver to him a quitclaim deed to a three-hundred-fifteen-acre tract of which the premises were a part, and execute a general release of all claims against the defendant, all at a time stated, and the house burned down before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appleton Electric Co. v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bryant v. Willison Real Estate Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API