Legal Opinion

McCombs v. Synthes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 2003No. S01G1633PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari in this products liability case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that the appellant, Linda McCombs, could not assert certain arguments on appeal concerning the “learned intermediar/’ doctrine because she had not specifically asserted them below. Because appellee Synthes Spine Company (“Synthes Spine”) moved for and was granted summary judgment on McCombs’s failure to warn claim based on the learned intermediary doctrine, and because the arguments raised on appeal by McCombs concerning that doctrine were arguments that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Kathleen Ziliak v. Astrazeneca Lp and Astrazeneca AbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Presto v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Donna Ellis v. C. R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Williams v. American Medical SystemsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Dietz v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Heard v. City of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API