Legal Opinion

De Mov v. Siodmak

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Liff, J.

This matter was referred to this court from Special Term, Part I, by Mr. Justice Berhakd S. Meyer.

The defendant Siodmak who is now employed by the corporate defendant, prior to April 17,1964, was employed by the' plaintiff as a route salesman in plaintiff’s business of selling food supplies and products to restaurants, hotels, bars, etc. It appears that a considerable part, if not all, of the plaintiff’s goods is packaged under a trade name.

The employer and employee entered into an agreement which contained the following provision: “ The salesman agrees not to enter into the food business as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Cater Cart Corp. v. CohanNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karpinski v. IngrasciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API