Legal Opinion

Tierney v. Szumny

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1930No. Gen. No. 33,570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryner

This appeal presents for our consideration the record of a trial court which is, to say the least, unique. There were entered, during the course of the proceeding, five so-called nunc pro tunc orders and there was returned what we, for the want of a better appellation, term a nunc pro tunc verdict as to the defendants who have appealed.

On February 23, 1927, the plaintiff filed her declaration in the circuit court of Cook county, charging that Bruno Szumny, Anton Szumny, Charles Smith and the Standard Cab Company, a corporation, were liable to her for damages on account of personal injuries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RosenwaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hubbard v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People ex rel. Fensky v. LeineckeIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Frew v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. McKay v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitworth v. MorganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Hall v. McMillianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API