Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Bergquist

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGolden, J.

This is a suit pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Law to establish on behalf of the Town of North Hempstead its status as fee owner, and its right to the possession of certain lands described in paragraph 3 of the complaint, and to bar the defendants and each of them from any and all claim or interest therein.

The sole contesting defendant is Russell Genner. Judgment by default has been directed against all others. The plaintiffs concede that title to a certain portion of the real estate involved, described in the testimony and exhibits as “ Parcel A ” is validly in defendant Genner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Hinkley v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Romeo v. SherryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  2. City of New York v. Sarnelli Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API