Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Harmon's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion' op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Reversing.

Tills action was instituted, under the Federal Employers ’ Liability Act, by the administrator of the estate of Mack Harmon, deceased, against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company to recover the damages suffered by the estate of Harmon on account of his death, which it was alleged was caused by the negligence of the employees of the appellant, railroad company. A+ the time of his death, the decedent was riding in the caboose of a freight train of the appellant, which was called train No. 81, and consisted of forty-eight cars and was proceeding from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Fletcher v. Baltimore & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Reynolds v. Addison Miller Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rogers v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Bourne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Watkins v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API