Legal Opinion

Quillen v. Lessenger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Henry District Court. — Oscar Hale, Judge. Action at law to recover damages resulting from defendant’s alleged wrongful and malicious conduct while trespassing on plaintiff’s premises. Verdict of jury in favor of plaintiff for $999. Defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

— The petition alleges that the defendant, Dr. W. E. Lessenger, entered the premises occupied by the plaintiff and her husband as a home, on Sunday evening, March 18, 1918, with a malicious and wrongful intent to abuse and assault plaintiff’s husband; that he did at said time and place curse, assault, and bruise plaintiff’s husband in the presence of plaintiff; that he also broke a window in plaintiff’s home, with the malicious intent of terrorizing the plaintiff; that, by reason of said conduct, plaintiff suffered great mental pain and physical injury and damages in the sum of $5,000.…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wheatley Ex Rel. Wheatley v. HeidemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Shuck v. KeefeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Lybarger v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. CanalleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API