Legal Opinion

U. S. Trust Co. v. Bixby

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to confirm report of referee upon judicial settlement of administrators’ account. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The account of the administrator and administratrix of this estate shows that they have in their hands a balance of $2,918.88.

I am asked to determine whether, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, they are chargeable with interest upon that amount or upon any portion thereof.

It appears by the testimony that, in March, 1876, the business of administering this estate was nearly completed. Its cash assets then amounted to about $1,763.48. It had, besides, an unsettled claim which, in February, 1882, was compromised with the sanction of the Surrogate, and from which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunscomb v. DunscombNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Hasler v. HaslerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1850
  3. Freeman v. FreemanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1880
  4. Gilman v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Harrington v. LibbyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Butler's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1888
  2. In re BlakeneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API