Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kapelus v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1987No. L.A. 32207Published

1Concurrence

KLINE (J. Anthony), J.*

I concur in the judgment ordering disbarment but dissent with respect to the standard of review.

My conclusion that petitioner should be disbarred rests primarily upon the fact that he has suffered two prior impositions of discipline. Standards recently promulgated by the State Bar prescribe disbarment in such circumstances, unless “the most compelling mitigating circumstances clearly predominate.” (Rules Proc. of State Bar, div. V, Standards for Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct (eff. Jan. 1, 1986) std. 1.7(b).)1 This court has deemed that sanction applicable even…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API