Garfield v. Greenbaum, Wolff & Ernst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Asch, J. (dissenting).
I would dissent and affirm the judgment of Special Term. The heart of the arrangement between plaintiff and defendant law firm comes down to his being compensated based on a sliding scale, dependent upon the amount of fees earned by his former law firm from a former client. The *711agreement specified that plaintiff would be available for consultation as long as his health permitted. Even if he were not available to give advice because of ill health, he would still be entitled to his percentage. It has been conceded that for the last two years at least, because of ill…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Orenstein v. AlbertNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Orenstein v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Moffat v. CresapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Moffat v. CresapNew York Court of Appeals · 1971