State v. Farrah, Unpublished Decision (4-18-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Defendant, Ali M. Farrah, was indicted on July 14, 2000, and charged with multiple counts of robbery and aggravated robbery. Defendant was tried before a jury which found him guilty of all counts. On August 3, 2001, defendant was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. He now appeals, raising the following four assignments of error:
I. The trial court abused its discretion when it refused defense counsel the opportunity to call a material witness for the defense.
II. The trial court abused its discretion when it admitted unauthenticated videotape evidence.
III. Appellant's trial counsel's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.