Legal Opinion

T.W.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 1996No. Nos. 96-67 to 96-71PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges orders of restitution entered against him, over defense counsel’s objection, more than sixty days after his disposition hearing. Campbell v. State, 614 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The state responds that the trial court made a timely ruling to order restitution at the April 1995 disposition hearing and reserved jurisdiction merely to determine the amount of restitution, a procedure approved in Gladfelter v. State, 618 So.2d 1364 (Fla.1993), State v. M.C., 666 So.2d 877 (Fla.1995) (approving holding that where trial court merely reserved jurisdiction on question of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SandersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Gladfelter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. State v. M.C.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. L.O. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. L.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. B.M.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. LO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. LO v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API