Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 20, 1999No. 98-3783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner is represented by the public defender in two criminal cases. The public defender certified to the trial judge that he has a conflict of interest requiring withdrawal in both cases because his office represents a woman who is named as a state witness in only one of the cases. The trial judge permitted withdrawal in the case in which the woman had been named as a witness, but denied leave to withdraw in the other case. The Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Guzman v. State, 644 So.2d 996 (Fla.1994), leaves us no choice but to grant the petition. Guzman makes it clear that under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Reardon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Leslie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Filan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API