Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Duplak

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 9, 2018No. 17–P–620Published

1Opinion of the Court

After a bench trial in the Ayer District Court, a judge convicted the defendant, Jessica L. Duplak, of possession of a class E substance, Gabapentin.2 On appeal from the denial of her motion for new trial, which was consolidated with her direct appeal, the defendant argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) file a motion to suppress statements given in the absence of Miranda warnings; (2) object to the admission of those statements at trial; and (3) present evidence that would bolster her claim that she had a prescription to possess Gabapentin. Because we conclude that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API