Commonwealth v. Duplak
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
After a bench trial in the Ayer District Court, a judge convicted the defendant, Jessica L. Duplak, of possession of a class E substance, Gabapentin.2 On appeal from the denial of her motion for new trial, which was consolidated with her direct appeal, the defendant argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) file a motion to suppress statements given in the absence of Miranda warnings; (2) object to the admission of those statements at trial; and (3) present evidence that would bolster her claim that she had a prescription to possess Gabapentin. Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.