Legal Opinion · Dissent

Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1976No. 75-1038Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Stevens, with whom Mr. Justice Rehnquist joins,

dissenting.

Appellants contend that California may not impose its sales tax on the sale of printed forms and other tangibles to Crocker-Citizens National Bank because the legal incidence of the tax falls upon a federal instrumentality. The California Court of Appeal, applying a construction of the California statute that has been consistently followed for over 40 years, held that the legal incidence of the tax falls upon the vendor rather than the purchaser.1

*269Since the case involves a federal claim of immunity from state taxation, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. First Agricultural National Bank of Berkshire County v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API