Excise Board of Marshall County v. School Dist. No. 34
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentKornegay, J.
I dissent from the views of the majority as expressed in the opinion rendered. As I view it, the decision practically strikes down the foundation of our tax collecting and our tax limiting laws. The doctrines of a generation are overturned and superseded. Plethoric in language, vigorous in tone, with sections of syllabus 13 in number, each positive in assertion, and each consistent with self, all animated by the spirit of the crusades, the opinion appears to me to be fittingly described as a magazine full of dynamite, located perilously near the tax limiting machinery provided in the year…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prince Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- People ex rel. Schnackenberg v. CzarneckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- School Dist. No. 4 v. Independent School Dist. No. 4½Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Tilley v. OvertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.