Legal Opinion

Juncker v. Tinney

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 3, 1982No. Civ. Y-80-2963PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Maryland Correctional Institution, brings the following claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983:

In all cells within the institution, there are radiators that get extremely hot. There are no covers on said radiators to protect inmates from sustaining severe burns. On October 22, 1980, I was severely burnt on my radiator.

He seeks $110,000 in compensatory damages and an injunction directing the defendants to place protective coverings on all radiators in the institution.

The defendants moved to dismiss, on the ground that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Francis Nolan Augustine v. John Doe, Deputy Sheriff, Lafayette ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Kitchen v. IckesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  3. James Thibodeaux v. James Bordelon, Linda BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Roy E. Daniels v. Andrew Williams, DeputyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Begg v. MoffittDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API