Legal Opinion

Evans v. Murphy Varnish Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Nathaniel C. Sears, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Hr. Justice Cary

delivered the opinion op the Court.

The appellee sued the appellant upon a promissory note, the declaration containing one special count describing the note, and common counts.

The appellee needlessly proved by a witness the amount due upon the note. The computation could have been made by the jury without help. In practice it is usually stated by the attorney, and his statement accepted by the jury, without an oath by anybody, except by the defendant after judgment.

There was therefore no error in denying a cross-examination of that witness as to the consideration of the note. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKone v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  2. City of Mt. Vernon v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West Chicago St. R. R. v. ReddyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API