Legal Opinion

Frick Company v. Seibel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is a suit on a contract of guaranty. The case was tried by the court, without the aid of a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3070.45. Defendant has appealed.

The facts show that Frick Company, a corporation of the State of Pennsylvania, entered into a contract with Seibel Company, located in Kansas City, constituting the latter its factor for the sale of certain of its equipment. Paragraph Four of the contract reads as follows:

“Fourth, you (Seibel Company) are to issue written orders for purchases made specifying the equipment required and make…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank Herman & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Tyson v. ReineckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Johnson v. Franklin BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Citizens Bank v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. BensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Crowe v. Covington Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API