Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Eogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Defendant, James E. Morrow, was convicted of embezzlement, and he appeals.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

Some two years prior to the. 15th day of April, 1913, defendant was the general manager of the Owensboro Home Telephone & Telegraph Company at Owensboro, Kentucky. As such it was his duty, among other things, to collect tolls, fees and charges from the company’s subscribers and others doing business with it, and to make settlements with the company for the amount so collected. In April, 1913, the auditor of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. State v. JoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Sergent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Rogers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API