Legal Opinion
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 14, 1978No. Civ. H-74-398PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
In this pro se action Alan Roy Hollander, a white male, alleges that because of his race Sears, Roebuck & Co. excluded him from consideration for a position in its Summer Internship Program for Minority Students. In an earlier ruling on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, it was held that 42 U.S.C. § 1981 provided a cause of action for the plaintiff who alleged that he was the victim of racial discrimination. Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F.Supp. 90 (D.Conn.1975). See McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co., 427 U.S. 273, 96 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fullilove v. KrepsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Adam v. Obama for AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Local Union No. 35 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Marvelli v. Chaps Community Health CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Meyers v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.