Legal Opinion

Wilkens Square, LLLP v. W.C. Pinkard & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 2011No. 23, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The ease at bar presents the question of whether the seller of real property is entitled to refuse to pay an agreed upon fee to the broker who represented the seller, on the ground that the broker was a “dual agent.” In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, W.C. Pinkard & Co., Inc. (“Colliers Pinkard”), Respondent, filed a Complaint in which it asserted that Wilkens Square, LLLP and Stone and Associates, Inc., Petitioners, had breached their agreement to pay the “Advisory Fee” that Respondent earned while acting as Petitioners’ broker in the sale of Petitioners’ real property located at 300…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Cochran v. NorkunasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Collier v. MD-Individual Practice Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Fister v. Allstate Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C & M Builders, LLC v. StrubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. C & M Builders, LLC v. StrubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Jessie Perkins, et al. v. Sandy Spring Builders, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API