Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Pratt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1903No. Docket No. 219Published

Exceptions before judgment from Ingham; Wiest, J. Charles H. Pratt was convicted of bribery.

1DissentGrant, J.

A grand jury had been summoned by the circuit court of Ingham county, Judge Person presiding. One of the subjécts under investigation by the grand jury was an attempt to bribe legistators to secure the passage of a certain bill then pending before the legislature. The respondent was the agent of and represented a corporation in the attempt to secure the passage of this bill. Undoubtedly the respondent believed that he was summoned as a witness before the grand jury to testify in regard to this transaction. Before going before the grand jury he went to the presiding judge, and made a voluntary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Shinglemeyer v. Wright.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Wieman v. MabeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API