Romero v. International Harvester Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant/appellant Navistar International Transportation Corporation (“Navis-tar”), formerly International Harvester Company, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial in this products liability case. We hold that, under Colorado law, a manufacturer has no duty to notify previous purchasers of its products about later-developed safety devices, or to retrofit those products when the products were non-defective under…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Oja v. Howmedica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Taylor v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Perlmutter v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Occusafe, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Eg&g Rocky Flats, Inc., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.