Legal Opinion

Sebring v. Conkling

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1880Published

Bill to foreclose. Motion that cross-bill be dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

This is a suit for foreclosure and sale of mortgaged premises. The present owner of the property assumed the payment of both the first and second mortgages. The bill, which is filed by the holder of the first mortgage, prays a decree for deficiency against the owner. The second mortgagee having answered, setting up his mortgage, filed a cross-bill against the owner of the property with a view to obtaining a decree for deficiency in his favor against the latter. The owner of the property moves to dismiss that bill.

A cross-bill is a defence, and it therefore must be confined 'to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffith v. . MerrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API