Sebring v. Conkling
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Bill to foreclose. Motion that cross-bill be dismissed.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
This is a suit for foreclosure and sale of mortgaged premises. The present owner of the property assumed the payment of both the first and second mortgages. The bill, which is filed by the holder of the first mortgage, prays a decree for deficiency against the owner. The second mortgagee having answered, setting up his mortgage, filed a cross-bill against the owner of the property with a view to obtaining a decree for deficiency in his favor against the latter. The owner of the property moves to dismiss that bill.
A cross-bill is a defence, and it therefore must be confined 'to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Griffith v. . MerrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1859