Legal Opinion
National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 21, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2011-0445Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 11-444 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 11-445 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION After over six years of litigation, involving three rounds of dispositive motions and three memorandum opinions, the plaintiff, National Security Counselors (“NSC”), seeks a total of $66,944.83 for attorneys’ fees and costs in…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.