Legal Opinion

Rather v. Suthers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1999No. 98SA56PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

The petitioner-appellant, Paul F. Rather, appeals pro se the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to section 13-4-102(l)(e), 5 C.R.S. (1998). Before the District Court of Lincoln County, Rather petitioned for his immediate release from the Department of Corrections (DOC) arguing that he was entitled to have good time credits and earned time deducted from his sentence, thereby making him eligible for immediate release. The district court disagreed, holding that good time and earned time are used for the purpose of determining an inmate’s parole…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Kodama v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Bynum v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Aue v. DiesslinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PereaColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Fields v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Fletcher v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  4. People v. PereaColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API