Legal Opinion

Mooradian v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 14, 2017No. CASE NO. 1:17–cv–1132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Defendant FCA US, LLC ("FCA") requests that the Court sanction Plaintiff White and his counsel for spoliating evidence.1 FCA manufactures Chrysler automobiles, including Jeep Wranglers. Plaintiffs oppose the sanction motion, arguing that no spoliation occurred.2

For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART Defendant's motion.

I. Background

This is a case about sand. Specifically, in this case, the Plaintiffs allege that casting sand used in creating Jeep Wrangler engine *867parts seeps into those vehicles' radiators, causing heating and cooling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  2. Adkins v. WoleverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Kenneth Adkins v. Basil WoleverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Crown Battery Manufacturing Co. v. Club Car, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lysengen v. Argent Trust CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2022
  2. Spectrum Scientifics, LLC v. Celestron Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Spratley v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
  4. Tomassini v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API