Legal Opinion

Hedquist v. Peter Sundquist & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1929No. 27,505PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying compensation claimed by the dependent widow of John Hedquist, deceased.

Motion was made for the dismissal or discharge of the writ because of the failure of relator to comply with G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 4320. The statute provides that within 30 days from the receipt by the secretary of the industrial commission of the statutory fee of $10 and the “filing with the commission of the return to writ of certiorari and bond, the secretary shall transmit to the clerk of the Supreme Court a true and complete return of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Rambeck v. La BreeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Reardon v. City of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Martin v. Northern Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Olson v. Robert Street Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API