Legal Opinion

Eason v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This action was instituted by the appellants against the appellee. The appellants alleged that a judgment was obtained against them in the Hot Spring-Chancery Court, which was declared a lien against a certain lot in Malvern, Arkansas, and the lot was ordered sold to satisfy the judgment; that,,on the day of sale, Alice Wilson, acting as agent of Creen Eason, entered into a contract with W. W. Wheeler to buy in the lot for appellants, with the understanding that they were to pay Wheeler the amount bid by him with ten per cent, interest until the amount for which the lot was sold and the costs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Bray v. TimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Tillar v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Ammonette v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. LaCotts v. LaCottsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mandley v. BackerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Coleman v. WegmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. McNutt v. CarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. S. & M. Oil Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Wofford v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API