Legal Opinion

O'Sullivan v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 2021No. 3/21Published

1Opinion of the Court

Michael O’Sullivan v. State of Maryland, No. 3, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. PERJURY – PROSECUTION’S BURDEN OF PRODUCTION – COMMON LAW “TWO-WITNESS” RULE – The Court of Appeals declined to abrogate Maryland’s common law “two-witness” rule. The rule provides that the State does not meet its burden of production with respect to the falsity element of a perjury prosecution if it offers only a single witness who testifies directly and positively that the defendant’s prior testimony was false. The State can prove falsity entirely through circumstantial evidence, by introducing direct…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API