Stiefel v. City of Kent
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
¶1 — The provision of fire protection services is a governmental rather than a propriety function. The public duty doctrine therefore bars any claims for the negligent failure to supply water for fire fighting purposes *526or the negligent failure to enforce fire code provisions. Because appellants Russell and Bonnie Stiefel and United Services Automobile Association (the Stiefels) failed to establish any material factual dispute as to the application of the public duty doctrine, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of their claims against the city of Kent, the Kent Fire Department, and the Kent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- J & B Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fabre v. Town of RustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Knutson v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- In Re Guardianship of KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Sunshine Heifers, LLC v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- City of Wenatchee v. Chelan County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.