Legal Opinion

Bank of New Glarus v. Swartwood

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 26, 2006No. 2005AP647PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

¶ 1. The dispute in this case is between Ameriquest and Bank of New Glarus, both of which claim a primary secured interest in real estate owned by Clarence and Kathy Swartwood. Ameriquest appeals from a summary judgment order determining that a real estate security agreement (RESA) held by Bank of New Glarus encumbering the Swartwood property had priority over a mortgage held by Ameriquest. Ameriquest also appeals from the circuit court's determination that the Swartwoods owed Bank of New Glarus $149,267.17.

¶ 2. We conclude: (1) Ameriquest's mortgage is subordinate to Bank of New Glarus's…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seelen v. Couillard (In re Couillard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  2. In re ThulisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  3. In re McGoughUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  4. Seelen v. Couillard (In re Couillard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API