Legal Opinion

Coppedge v. Aycock Mortgage & Bond Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1936No. 25485PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

1. A discharge in bankruptcy is based either on the proper and timely scheduling of the debt, or on the fact that the creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the bankruptcy proceeding; but for either to work a discharge, the schedule of the debt should be filed, or the notice or knowledge of the bankruptcy should be received, within one year after the bankruptcy adjudication, and within such time as to give the creditor an equal opportunity with other creditors to participate in the affairs of the estate. Bell v. Georgia Chemical Works, 33 Ga. App. 286 (125 S. E. 871), and cit.

*438Decided…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Bell v. Georgia Chemical WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Coppedge v. Aycock Mortgage & Bond Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Tucker Professional AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Loudermilk v. Associates Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API