Legal Opinion
Gautreaux v. Pierce
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 11, 1982No. 66 C 1459, 66 C 1460PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
On January 25, 1982, this Court denied plaintiffs’ motion to modify the consent decree previously entered in this case so as to require that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) set aside approximately $324 million of the Government National Mortgage Association’s (“GNMA”) fiscal 1982 Tandem financing appropriation for section 8 new construction projects in the Chicago area (“Gautreaux projects”). Such extraordinary relief was sought in view of the Reagan Administration’s announced intention to ask Congress to abolish the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gautreaux v. PierceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- 25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1271, 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 177, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,253 United States of America v. City of Chicago v. Fraternal Order of Police, Etc., Intervening United States of America v. City of Chicago v. Robert W. Suess, Intervening United States of America v. City of Chicago v. Fraternal Order of Police, Etc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gautreaux v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Hill v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- Dorothy Gautreaux v. Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rogers Park Community Council, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants. Dorothy Gautreaux v. Moon Landrieu, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Appeal of Ginger MacK Class Member. Dorothy Gautreaux v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982