Hamilton v. State

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

Defendant Daniel Hamilton appeals from the judgments and sentences *1187imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the offenses of possession of cocaine1 and sale or delivery of cocaine.2 Hamilton contends that the trial court violated the prohibition against double jeopardy by imposing judgment and sentence on both convictions because the convictions were predicated upon a single criminal act, the sale of one rock of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. We agree. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987).3 See also Davis v. State, 550…