Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clute v. General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1989No. Docket 106425Published

1DissentMaher, P.J.

I respectfully dissent.

*424The section of the no-fault act which authorizes an award of attorney fees, § 3148(1), provides:

An attorney is entitled to a reasonable fee for advising and representing a claimant in an action for personal or property protection insurance benefits which are overdue. The attorney’s fee shall be a charge against the insurer in addition to the benefits recovered, if the court finds that the insurer unreasonably refused to pay the claim or unreasonably delayed in making proper payment. [MCL 500.3148(1); MSA 24.13148(1).]

Although the terms "unreasonably refused” and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liddell v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Darnell v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kalin v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Butt v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. English v. Home InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API